Find a term by its claimed mode
This is a vocabulary index, not an ability test.
Clairvoyance
Images
Clairaudience
Sounds
Clairempathy
Emotions
Clairsentience
Feelings and bodily impressions
Clairalience
Smells
Clairgustance
Tastes
Clairtangency
Touch and objects
Clair terms describe claimed forms of psychic perception; they are not a diagnostic checklist. Learning the words can make a spiritual discussion easier to follow, but it does not establish that everyone has a gift or that a particular sensation comes from a spirit.
The seven terms below appeared in this article’s original list. Their use can overlap, so ask a speaker what they mean rather than assuming every teacher follows the same classification.
1. Clairvoyance: claimed visual perception
In psychic discussions, clairvoyance is associated with purported access to information through images or visions beyond ordinary perception.
Imagination, a mental picture or a dream is not by itself evidence of that claim. If someone presents an image as a fact about another person, ask how the information could be independently checked.
2. Clairaudience: claimed hearing beyond ordinary perception
The APA Dictionary describes clairaudience as an alleged ability involving sounds or voices beyond normal hearing. That definition does not identify the cause of an individual experience.
Do not treat persistent voices or unexplained sounds as an instruction to keep practicing until they become stronger. Seek appropriate healthcare advice for concerning experiences; immediate danger requires urgent help.
3. Clairempathy: claimed emotional perception
This term is used in spiritual contexts for the claim of sensing someone else’s emotions without their explanation.
Ordinary empathy and careful listening do not grant access to private thoughts. Ask the person how they feel, allow correction and do not insist that your impression knows better than they do.
4. Clairsentience: claimed intuitive feeling
Clairsentience is often used more broadly for impressions described as feelings or bodily sensations. A person may interpret an uneasy or comforting response spiritually.
The interpretation is not established by the feeling alone. It does not prove a warning, another person’s character or someone else’s illness. See our clairsentience and boundaries guide for a closer discussion.
5. Clairalience: claimed spiritual smell
Clairalience is a label used for a smell interpreted as coming from a spiritual source. The label is an explanation someone is proposing, not a finding about what caused the smell.
Do not ignore a possible environmental hazard or a persistent sensory change because the scent seems meaningful. Take ordinary safety concerns seriously and seek appropriate advice when needed.
6. Clairgustance: claimed spiritual taste
Clairgustance refers to a taste interpreted as a psychic or spiritual impression. An unexpected taste does not establish that a spirit sent a message.
NIDCD’s taste-disorders guide describes taste experiences without food present and explains that assessment considers possible causes. Discuss persistent or worrying changes with a healthcare professional rather than assigning a spiritual cause.
7. Clairtangency: object-related perception claims
Clairtangency is used for claims about obtaining information through touch, often associated with psychometry. Collins defines the paranormal sense of psychometry as a supposed ability involving information linked to objects.
Touching an old watch and imagining its owner does not establish the watch’s history. Physical clues, prior knowledge and interpretation need to be considered. Obtain permission before handling another person’s belongings.
Three questions that apply to every term
- What is being described? An experience, a belief or a factual claim?
- What is the evidence? Is the information specific, independently checkable and recorded before feedback?
- What are the limits? Can the speaker acknowledge mistakes and avoid claims beyond what was established?
A meaningful experience can remain personally meaningful without becoming proof. A correct statement also does not automatically establish the claimed method used to obtain it.
Our guide to psychic signs checklists explains why broad traits are not enough to establish an ability.
Use the language responsibly
Do not use a clair label to diagnose a condition, accuse someone, reveal private information or direct another person’s major decisions. Keep consent and ordinary fact-checking in the conversation.
For a broader vocabulary reference, see our psychic-gift glossary. For a way to record an experience without rushing to a label, use the neutral reflection guide.
17 frequently asked questions
1. Does everyone have one of the seven clair gifts?
This article does not establish that claim. Relating to a description or knowing the vocabulary does not prove a paranormal ability.
2. Are these seven terms a standard diagnostic system?
No. Usage can overlap between spiritual teachers and communities. Ask what a speaker means instead of treating the list as a test or a fixed classification.
3. What is clairvoyance?
In psychic discussions, it refers to claimed information through images or visions beyond ordinary perception. A mental picture alone does not verify that claim.
4. What is clairaudience?
It is an alleged ability involving hearing beyond ordinary perception. A definition names the claim; it does not explain the cause of a particular sound or voice.
5. What is clairempathy?
The term is used for claimed perception of another person’s emotions without their explanation. Ordinary empathy and listening do not establish access to private thoughts.
6. How does clairsentience differ from clairempathy?
Clairempathy usually emphasizes emotions, while clairsentience is often used more broadly for impressions described as feelings or bodily sensations. The terms overlap, so clarify the intended meaning.
7. What is clairalience?
It is a spiritual label for a smell interpreted as coming from a nonordinary source. That interpretation is not established simply because a scent seems meaningful.
8. What is clairgustance?
It describes a taste interpreted as a psychic or spiritual impression. An unexpected taste does not by itself establish a spirit message.
9. What is clairtangency?
It is used for claims about information gained through touch, often connected with psychometry. Touching an object and imagining its past is not the same as independently establishing its history.
10. What does psychometry mean in this context?
Here it refers to a supposed paranormal ability involving information associated with objects. The article uses the psychic meaning, not a method for verifying every fact about an item.
11. Does a correct statement prove the claimed method?
Not automatically. Consider specificity, information already available, physical clues and feedback. Establishing a fact and establishing how it was obtained are different questions.
12. Can I infer someone’s feelings from my own bodily sensations?
Your sensations alone do not establish another person’s emotional state or health. Ask how they feel and allow them to correct your impression.
13. Should I try to make unexplained voices stronger?
No. Do not intensify a concerning sensory experience as a psychic exercise. Seek appropriate healthcare advice, and urgent help if there is immediate danger.
14. What should I do about a persistent unusual smell or taste?
Take possible environmental hazards seriously and discuss persistent or worrying sensory changes with a healthcare professional. A spiritual label should not replace assessment.
15. May I handle someone’s belongings to explore psychometry?
Ask permission first and accept a refusal. Ownership of an object does not become irrelevant because you want to interpret it spiritually.
16. What should I record before checking an impression?
Write the original, specific statement and what information you already had before receiving feedback. Include uncertainty and outcomes that do not match, not only apparent successes.
17. Can I use these terms for a personal belief?
Yes, while distinguishing belief from verified fact. Do not use a label to diagnose, accuse, disclose private information or direct another person’s major decisions.

I am absolutely fascinated by the nuanced delineation of psychic gifts in this article. It provides an illuminating overview that can help individuals recognize and cultivate their inherent abilities. Each type is described with such clarity that it opens the door to deeper understanding and self-exploration.
I completely agree, Murray. The descriptions are so well-articulated that they demystify what could be an abstract topic for many. It’s encouraging to know that everyone possesses some form of psychic ability.
Indeed, this article serves as a beacon of insight for anyone looking to explore their psychic potential. The clear definitions can act as a guide for self-discovery and personal growth.
This article was an enlightening read! The detailed explanations of various psychic gifts, such as clairvoyance and clairsentience, have broadened my understanding of the subject. It’s fascinating to consider that some people are naturally attuned to the spiritual world in so many diverse ways. I especially appreciate the encouragement to embrace and develop one’s innate abilities. Truly inspiring!
This article is both enlightening and inspiring. It underscores the diversity of psychic gifts, which can greatly aid individuals in identifying and nurturing their unique abilities. The emphasis on embracing these gifts is an uplifting reminder that we all have untapped potential waiting to be discovered.
What an insightful article! The breakdown of different psychic gifts, including lesser-discussed ones like clairalience and clairgustance, was particularly intriguing. It’s remarkable how our senses can extend beyond the physical realm to connect with the spiritual. The final thoughts were a wonderful reminder that even subtle intuitions are significant and should be embraced. Excellent read!